CourierPostOnline front page South Jersey News Sports Entertainment Classifieds Jobs Cars Real Estate Shopping


Customer Service
· Subscribe Now
· Switch to EZ-Pay
· About Us

Today's Weather
[an error occurred while processing this directive]
Metro Editor
Donna Jenkins
News Sections
South Jersey News
World Report
Sports
Business
Living
Opinion
Varsity
Weekly Sections
Communities
New! Nuestra Comunidad
Senior Scoop
South Jersey Living
South Jersey Scene
Static for Teens
Technology
Volunteers
Women on the Run
[an error occurred while processing this directive]
Featured
In Our Community
Corrections
Dating
Gannett Foundation
In Memoriam
Lottery Results
Obituaries
Pets
Photo Galleries
New! Spot News Kids Korner
South Jersey Guide
Weddings, Engagements & Anniversaries
Thursday, August 11, 2005Past Issues - S | M | T | W | T | F | S
 
South Jersey

Dredge-muck boondoggle keeps raising questions

Where we stand: Delaware officials should be concerned about the plan that has South Jersey representatives alarmed.

Delaware officials are the latest to say "not so fast" to a proposed $311 million Delaware River dredging project. Add their concerns to the list of worries and, hopefully, more people will see this project as the boondoggle it is.

Sarah Cooksey, administrator for the Delaware Coastal Management program, said her group has asked the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers for wetland and pollution reviews before the channel is dredged.

While the state of Delaware, which officially endorses the dredging project, still might have some concerns, there's no denying that South Jersey residents should be asking questions.

Lowering the 40-foot channel 5 feet certainly raises environmental questions. But what about 10 feet? The new supercargo ships of the future will require 50 feet or more of river depth. Isn't this 5-foot drop just a step toward that goal?

And where will the millions of cubic yards of river muck be dumped? If Sen. Robert Torricelli, D-N.J., Rep. Rob Andrews, D-N.J., and Gloucester County leaders have anything to say about it and they do South Jersey will not be turned into a dumping ground.

What about the benefits to the Pennsylvania oil companies? Since they will save about $40 million in lighterage, shouldn't they be kicking in to help pay for the dredging? And, why are we doing this to help the oil companies? Are they planning to relocate the refineries?

And where are the plans and the money to help South Jersey communities who want to develop riverfront property? These same people who want to dig out the river, possibly stirring up toxins and dumping muck on our land, have to have the same level of support both moral and financial for these community improvement projects.

This dredging project comes at a time of rebirth for the river. Two hundred years ago, pollution and toxins in the river killed people. Now, people can't wait to relax beside or on the water.

Do we have questions about this project? You bet. It's good to see the folks down in Delaware also aren't giving up the fight without demanding a few answers, too.



Copyright 2005 Courier-Post. Use of this site signifies your agreement to the Terms of Service (updated December, 2002).
For questions, comments, or problems
contact us.

The Courier-Post is a part of Gannett Co. Inc., parent company of USA Today.

FIND A JOB
FIND A CAR
FIND A HOME
CLASSIFIEDS
Deals and Coupons
Auto Deals
Consumer Web Directory
Coupons
End of Month Values
Customer Central
Subscribe
Customer Service
About Us
Contacts
Advertise
Courier-Post Store
Jobs at the Courier-Post
Jobs with Gannett