CourierPostOnline front page South Jersey News Sports Entertainment Classifieds Jobs Cars Real Estate Shopping


Customer Service
· Subscribe Now
· Switch to EZ-Pay
· About Us

Today's Weather
[an error occurred while processing this directive]
Metro Editor
Donna Jenkins
News Sections
South Jersey News
World Report
Sports
Business
Living
Opinion
Varsity
Weekly Sections
Communities
New! Nuestra Comunidad
Senior Scoop
South Jersey Living
South Jersey Scene
Static for Teens
Technology
Volunteers
Women on the Run
[an error occurred while processing this directive]
Featured
In Our Community
Corrections
Dating
Gannett Foundation
In Memoriam
Lottery Results
Obituaries
Pets
Photo Galleries
New! Spot News Kids Korner
South Jersey Guide
Weddings, Engagements & Anniversaries
Thursday, August 11, 2005Past Issues - S | M | T | W | T | F | S
 
South Jersey

Remarks about sediment draw criticism

The district commander for the Army Corps of Engineers says it's time for Gloucester County officials to change their tune about the big Delaware River dredging project.

The Philadelphia District's commander, Lt. Col. Debra M. Lewis, on Thursday argued sediments dredged from the river as part of the $311 million channel deepening project could become an economic boon to the county

The county, Lewis said, could work with the project's sponsor, the Delaware River Port Authority, in marketing the sediments as "beneficial" material to fill in sand pits and coal mines, for use in road construction projects, even as fill dirt beneath sinking homes in Philadelphia.

Although the materials would still be dumped in South Jersey, the size of the dump sites could be kept in check by selling the material, Lewis said.

"If they (the county) only look at it as a resource, they will find many uses for it." Lewis said. "They're shutting the door."

Gloucester County Freeholder-Director Stephen Sweeney was incredulous, countering the DRPA would have proposed alternative uses for the materials if there were any. DRPA officials could not be reached for comment.

"She's got to be kidding me," Sweeney said, explaining the county's environmental concerns about the project are far from satisfied. "Maybe she thinks we're just foolish."

The freeholders plan to meet with mayors from throughout the county today to drum up opposition to the dredging project. The freeholders hope to get resolutions from all 24 mayors opposing the project on the grounds that it could harm groundwater supplies and riverfront development opportunities.

The Army Corps has identified two suitable dumping sites in Logan and one in Oldmans, Salem County. An old dump site in National Park could also be used for the project.

Lewis said the owner of a sand pit adjacent to one of the Logan sites has approached the Army Corps with the possibility of filling in the pit with dredged sediments.

Lewis insisted that while some of the material to be dredged from the river contains industrial contaminants, most is "essentially virgin soil."

It's just a matter of being able to separate the soils based on intended uses, Lewis said, explaining most users want specific grades of sand and sediment while the dredging process tends to mix them up. For example, landscapers want only top sediments that are rich in nutrients while road builders want coarser grains, she said.

"I believe there is a greater need for the material than the supply available," Lewis said.

-- LAWRENCE R. HAJNA



Copyright 2005 Courier-Post. Use of this site signifies your agreement to the Terms of Service (updated December, 2002).
For questions, comments, or problems
contact us.

The Courier-Post is a part of Gannett Co. Inc., parent company of USA Today.

FIND A JOB
FIND A CAR
FIND A HOME
CLASSIFIEDS
Deals and Coupons
Auto Deals
Consumer Web Directory
Coupons
End of Month Values
Customer Central
Subscribe
Customer Service
About Us
Contacts
Advertise
Courier-Post Store
Jobs at the Courier-Post
Jobs with Gannett