CourierPostOnline front page South Jersey News Sports Entertainment Classifieds Jobs Cars Real Estate Shopping


Customer Service
· Subscribe Now
· Switch to EZ-Pay
· About Us

Today's Weather
[an error occurred while processing this directive]
Editorial Page Editor
Mark Correa
News Sections
South Jersey News
World Report
Sports
Business
Living
Opinion
Varsity
Weekly Sections
Communities
New! Nuestra Comunidad
South Jersey Golf
Senior Scoop
South Jersey Living
South Jersey Scene
Static for Teens
Technology
Volunteers
Women on the Run
Editorial Page Columnists
bob ingle
David
Broder
Linda
Chavez
Norman
Lockman
Ellen
Goodman
Michelle
Malkin
Molly
Ivins
Cal
Thomas
DeWayne
Wickham
In Our Community
Corrections
Dating
Gannett Foundation
In Memoriam
Lottery Results
Obituaries
Pets
New! Spot News Kids Korner
South Jersey Guide
Weddings, Engagements & Anniversaries
Thursday, August 11, 2005Past Issues - S | M | T | W | T | F | S
 
Opinion

Light rail could drain too much money away

Sunday, March 23, 2003

NJ Transit should study to see whether the plug should be pulled.

Until recently, the reasonable attitude about the new South Jersey Light Rail Line seems to have been that we might as well go ahead and finish it, for all its faults.

Much money has been spent already on this. So even though the $1.2 billion project is costing more than expected and contains baffling shortcomings (it doesn't go along a particularly well-traveled route; it won't run late at night when people might actually use it to come home from the Tweeter Center), there seemed to be no reason to let all the money spent so far go to waste.

But now comes word that the major drain on taxpayer funds won't end when the project is finished, nor at any other time in the foreseeable future. Though running the line would cost nearly $70 million a year in operational costs and debt payments, fares look like they'll generate only $2.5 million.

So NJ Transit needs to study this service for the first year or two of operation and decide a sad, sad question: Will we lose more money by ending the project or by keeping it alive? If the latter, we should mentally prepare to pull the plug and cut our losses.

The reason we suggest giving the line a year or two to prove itself is that fare profits weren't the only reason the rail line has gone where it is. Planners also hoped to encourage development along that route. So part of how we judge the success of this project is by seeing whether development really does follow along.

And of course, we'd love to see the rail line succeed. We encourage everyone in South and Central Jersey to ride it and to consider the convenience of living or working along an established mass transit route.

But if commuters and developers don't show enough interest, the public should get used to the idea that this train service may simply not be worth a continuous drain on state finances, and NJ Transit should gear up to make that call.

No, we won't be glad to see a lot of empty rail cars, useless transit facilities and tracks to nowhere.

We won't exactly welcome these permanent reminders of effort and money sucked into space.

But maybe it will remind us all next time to look closely at major infrastructure projects and watch for the hand of patronage, politics and self-interest.



Copyright 2005 Courier-Post. Use of this site signifies your agreement to the Terms of Service (updated December, 2002).
For questions, comments, or problems
contact us.

The Courier-Post is a part of Gannett Co. Inc., parent company of USA Today.

FIND A JOB
FIND A CAR
FIND A HOME
CLASSIFIEDS
Deals and Coupons
Auto Deals
Consumer Web Directory
Coupons
End of Month Values
Customer Central
Subscribe
Customer Service
About Us
Contacts
Advertise
Courier-Post Store
Jobs at the Courier-Post
Jobs with Gannett